What It Means
Hofstadter's law is a joke rule about time estimates from the author Douglas Hofstadter: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law." The punchline is the loop at the end. Adding extra time because you know jobs run long still tends to fall short. It describes in one line the same pattern psychologists call the planning fallacyPlanning fallacyThe tendency to underestimate how long a task will take, even when similar tasks have run late before. See more.
Try It: Did Your Buffer Hold?
Enter three past jobs: the time you planned, buffer included, and the time they really took. Example numbers to start.
Most of your buffered plans still ran long. Hofstadter would not be surprised.
Your buffers mostly held. Keep checking as you add more jobs.
How People Say It
- "I added an extra day and it still wasn't enough."
- "Classic Hofstadter's law."
- "Two weeks, so call it a month."
The Breakdown
Worked example. Someone plans three jobs with extra time already added, then records what really happened. The numbers are examples.
| Job | Planned, buffer included | Took | Ran over? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kitchen cabinet painting | 6 hours | 8 hours | Yes |
| Tax paperwork | 4 hours | 4 hours | No |
| Garage clear-out | 1010,000 stepsA popular daily step goal that began as the name of a 1960s Japanese pedometer; later studies find health benefits begin well below it. See more hours | 13 hours | Yes |
| Total | 20 hours | 25 hours | 2 of 3 |
Even with buffers, the jobs took 25% longer than planned overall. A new job planned at 4 hours, scaled by that record, comes out at 5 hours.
What the result means. If most of your buffered plans still run over, the buffer is too small or it's being guessed instead of measured. Your own record is a better guide than a round number.
Steps to try (Buhata's suggestion)
- Time the next few jobs of one kind, and write down both the plan and the actual.
- Work out your overrun across them, as in the table.
- Scale your next plan by it, and keep tracking.
Where It Comes From
Douglas Hofstadter stated the law in his 1979 book Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, according to Oxford Reference's entry for him in Oxford Essential Quotations.
Good to Know
The planning fallacy, named by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, describes the same tendency to underestimate how long things take, and one fix for it is to look at how similar past jobs actually turned out, which is what the calculator does. Parkinson's law pulls the other way, since work tends to expand to fill the time it's given, so Buhata's suggestion is to tie the buffer to your record rather than leave it open-ended.
FAQ
What is Hofstadter's law?
The rule that a task always takes longer than you expect, even when you take Hofstadter's law into account. Douglas Hofstadter wrote it in Gödel, Escher, Bach in 1979.
How is Hofstadter's law different from the planning fallacy?
The planning fallacy is a term from psychology research for underestimating how long tasks take. Hofstadter's law is a one-line joke about the same thing, with a twist: knowing about it doesn't save you.
How do I plan around Hofstadter's law?
Base your estimates on your own record instead of a guess. Time a few similar jobs, compare plan and actual, and scale your next plan by the difference.
Do It in Buhata
Focus and Tasks
Time your next few jobs with the Focus stopwatch in Buhata, note the plan and the actual on each item in Tasks, and scale your next estimate by the difference.
Open BuhataRelated Terms and Categories
- Planning fallacy
The tendency to underestimate how long a task will take, even when similar tasks have run late before.
- Time tracking
Recording how much time goes to each task or type of work, either to see where your hours really go or to keep the hours records pay depends on.
Sources
Oxford Reference, "Douglas R. Hofstadter" (Oxford Essential Quotations); Oxford Reference, "Hofstadter's law"
- www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191826719.001.0001/q-oro-ed4-00017206
- www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095940493
Last updated .
